Why These Chains Matter

Modern weapons eat materials. Each F-35 contains 920 pounds of rare earths in engines, sensors, electronics. A Javelin missile needs 250 semiconductor chips. The F-35 uses over 3,000 microchips. Advanced hardware depends on neodymium magnets and gallium radar modules.

The energy transition multiplies demand. Electric vehicles need 35 times more copper than gas cars. A Honda Accord uses 40 pounds of copper. The electric version needs 200 pounds.

Scale this up and the math gets ugly. Electrifying the U.S. fleet could require mining 115% more copper than all of human history. Each wind turbine uses 10 tons of copper. Offshore turbines use more.

Semiconductors account for 0.3% of GDP directly but enable 12% of total output through autos, electronics, aerospace. The 2021 chip shortage cut auto production by millions of vehicles.

It shaved a full percentage point off economic growth. Total damage: $240 billion.

Where We're Exposed

The choke points tell a clear story. The Democratic Republic of Congo produces 70% of global cobalt. Eight of the 14 largest cobalt miners there are Chinese-owned. China refines 80% of the world's cobalt.

The pattern repeats. China controls 94% of gallium production and 80% of germanium. It processes 90% of rare earths and produces 75% of natural graphite. For battery-grade graphite, China's share hits 100%.

Our adversaries weaponize these dependencies. China cut rare earth shipments to Japan in 2010 during a maritime dispute. Prices jumped from $9,500 per ton to $67,000. Japanese manufacturers scrambled while their economy took the hit.

China escalated recently. Mid-2023 brought export restrictions on gallium and germanium, payback for U.S. chip curbs. December 2024: China banned exports of these materials to America entirely. Companies faced sudden supply crunches and price spikes.

The semiconductor shortage previewed systemic fragility. Auto plants idled worldwide. A single factory fire in Japan caused global chip ripples. The Pentagon admits most weapons programs are vulnerable because critical components come from single overseas sources.

Pentagon stockpile reports show 90% of critical materials with shortfalls had zero or one domestic supplier. Even without malicious action, a crisis abroad or cyberattack could cut off key inputs overnight.

The Price of Inaction

Supply interruptions during conflict could cripple major military programs. If China cut rare earth magnets or high-grade metals during a standoff, F-35 and precision munition production could halt within months.

The Pentagon calls critical material disruptions a "high potential harm to national security."

Congress directed DOD to stop sourcing rare earth magnets from China in 2019. That progress is slow, because alternatives barely exist. China controls the supply chain.

Critical civilian projects face similar delays. If tensions severed Chinese transformer or battery flows, power grid upgrades could see major setbacks. Clean energy projects might miss targets, keeping us on older energy sources longer.

Hostile nations use our dependencies without firing shots. China squeezed Japan on rare earths. Russia manipulated European gas. Beijing banned Australian coal and wine during diplomatic spats. Each time, targets suffered economic hardship and policy pressure.

The Government Accountability Office found materials with identified shortfalls nearly tripled from 37 in 2019 to 99 in 2023. DOD estimates it needs $18.5 billion to fix current shortfalls. The stockpile held less than $1 billion as of 2023.

A major defense contractor CEO recently noted supply chain fragility represents "the single greatest threat to meeting delivery schedules." Our military power could be hamstrung by missing parts.

Building Strength Back

We’re making progress. The CHIPS Act devoted $52.7 billion to U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. By late 2024, 23 new fab projects worth over $30 billion in subsidies launched across Arizona, Texas, New York, Ohio.

The reshoring wave is measurable. Companies announced 245,000 manufacturing jobs from reshoring in 2024 alone. Total since 2010: over 2 million jobs. Computer and electronics led the surge, driven by CHIPS incentives. Electrical equipment followed, pushed by EV battery demand.

The Pentagon started rebuilding the National Defense Stockpile after decades of neglect. Congress funded acquisition of rare earth oxides, lithium, tantalum. Since 2020, DOD invested $439 million in rare earth and critical material projects to jump-start domestic mining.

Strategic alliances are forming. The Minerals Security Partnership links the U.S. with Australia, Canada, Japan to secure non-Chinese sources. Recent agreements include rare earth cooperation with Australia and semiconductor task forces with the EU.

The challenge extends beyond factories and funding. After decades of manufacturing decline, skilled trades thinned dangerously. The American Welding Society projects a shortage of 300,000-400,000 welders as older workers retire faster than new ones enter. The manufacturing skills gap could leave 2.1 million jobs unfilled by 2030, costing $1 trillion in lost output.

Navy shipbuilders cite lack of qualified welders and pipefitters as bottlenecks in ramping submarine production. Recent policies fund apprenticeships and trade schools. The CHIPS Act requires fab projects to create workforce training plans. Companies partner with community colleges for fast-track programs.

Manufacturing work is being rebranded as high-tech, well-paid careers. U.S. auto manufacturing jobs hit their highest level in 34 years by mid-2024. Investment follows workforce development.

New plants break ground, strategic reserves grow slowly, supply chain security awareness spreads through boardrooms and government. The combination of reshoring, expanding stockpiles, allied networks, and training workers represents a modern industrial policy resurgence.

The Path Forward

This awakening comes at the right moment. Geopolitical competition, technological change, and industrial policy create both challenge and opportunity. Years of focus and investment are needed to close vulnerabilities that built up over decades.

The Pentagon holds the keys to rapid change. Defense contractors work on cost-plus contracts with guaranteed margins. They can absorb higher material costs that commercial manufacturers cannot.

Create defense-specific supply chains first. Military demand for rare earths and semiconductors provides stable revenue streams for new domestic suppliers. Once these suppliers achieve scale, costs drop for civilian applications.

The Other Transaction Authority bypasses traditional procurement. Use it aggressively. Defense startups landing OTA deals show where innovation happens fastest.

Establish long-term contracts with guaranteed volumes. Mining and refining require decade-plus investments. Companies need certainty before breaking ground.

Subsidies alone don't work. Korea and Japan built semiconductor industries through targeted protection and export promotion. The CHIPS Act spreads money across too many priorities. Concentrate resources on critical gaps.

Create dedicated industrial zones for strategic manufacturing. Environmental reviews that take three years kill momentum. Strategic industries need fast-track processes.

Use the Defense Production Act more aggressively. Title III allows government investment in critical production capacity. Recent administrations barely touched this tool.

Community colleges move faster than universities. Partner them directly with manufacturers for custom training programs. Six-month certifications beat four-year degrees for skilled trades.

Immigration reform could solve skilled worker shortages immediately. We make foreign engineers jump through hoops for years. This makes no strategic sense.

Create a National Development Bank focused on strategic industries. Private markets optimize for quarterly returns. Strategic investments need longer timelines.

Reform depreciation schedules for critical manufacturing equipment. Current tax code favors software over physical production. Manufacturing equipment should receive accelerated treatment.

Build the Minerals Security Partnership into economic NATO. Create binding mutual defense commitments for supply chain attacks. Economic warfare needs collective defense.

Establish joint strategic stockpiles with key allies. Australia has lithium, Canada has nickel, the U.S. has copper. Individual national stockpiles are expensive and inefficient.

Carbon border adjustments could protect domestic green technology manufacturing. Chinese solar panels benefit from cheap coal power and lax environmental standards. Level the playing field through trade policy.

Institute "Buy American" requirements that actually mean something. Current rules have too many loopholes. Close the gaps.

Track leading indicators, not lagging ones. Process engineer hiring rates predict semiconductor capacity better than completed fabs. Watch the pipeline, not current production.

Monitor foreign direct investment flows into strategic sectors. When Chinese companies acquire American materials technology, we lose capability permanently. Investment screening needs more resources.

Create public dashboards showing domestic production capacity for critical materials. Transparency drives accountability. Companies and investors need clear metrics.

The payoff justifies sustained effort: secure defense posture, resilience against shocks, economic benefits of high-tech manufacturing on American soil. In a world defined by technological competition, supply chain strength equals national strength.

Watch semiconductor companies hire process engineers this quarter. It's a proxy for how seriously we're taking this rebuild. Follow which defense startups land Other Transaction Authority deals.

America recognized this crisis and began the hard work of turning vulnerability into advantage. We're rebuilding strength one link at a time.

Forge Ahead posts 3x a week, covering all things American Dynamism. For completely free, get strategic insight on how to rebuild US strength, summaries of the top news (and how to adapt), explanatory pieces like this one, and much more.

If you want to be contribute to rebuilding American resilience, stay informed. Keep reading.