One uranium fuel pellet holds the energy of a ton of coal. It’s the size of a fingertip. Try getting that out of solar panels.

France proves the point. They rely on nuclear for 68% of their electricity. When the rest of Europe hits a crisis, France keeps exporting. That’s what stable looks like.

We don’t talk enough about space. Not outer space—land use. A single nuclear plant produces 1,000 megawatts per square mile. Wind? About 1 to 2. Solar comes in around 10. That matters when you're trying to power a country, not a shed.

Nuclear doesn’t sprawl. It doesn’t depend on the weather. And it doesn’t need constant backup from gas or batteries. Build it once and it works for decades.

It’s also carbon-free. If you're serious about cutting emissions without wrecking reliability, you can't leave nuclear off the table. Germany tried that. They shut down their plants and fired up the coal.

That kind of reliability matters when you’re running a chip fab, a military base, or a city full of AI servers. If we want uptime, we need power that doesn’t blink. Nuclear gives us that.

This isn’t about nostalgia for Cold War reactors. It’s about industrial logic. When the grid needs muscle, nuclear delivers. We’ve got the fuel, we’ve got the tech, and we’re finally getting the political will.

All that’s missing is the builders.

[4] Why Nuclear Collapsed in the U.S.

Nuclear was winning—until it wasn’t. In 1979, a partial meltdown at Three Mile Island triggered a national panic. The incident didn’t kill anyone, but the response killed nuclear. Over the next decade, 51 reactor projects were canceled, many of them mid-construction. No new projects were authorized to be constructed until 2012.

Regulators clamped down. Timelines ballooned. Costs followed. Utilities walked away rather than wait twenty years and risk a billion-dollar flop.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was designed to prevent accidents. It also prevented progress. Its one-size-fits-all approach made it nearly impossible to innovate or iterate. If you wanted to build a better, safer reactor, you had to fight the same paperwork as a Cold War giant.

Meanwhile, other countries got to work. France doubled down. South Korea built dozens. China is building more reactors now than the U.S. has operating. Russia sells reactors like infrastructure exports.

We turned nuclear into a punchline while the rest of the world scaled it.

Nuclear didn’t fail on science. It failed on fear, delay, and regulatory drag. That didn’t kill the technology. It just buried it under red tape.

The reactor isn’t broken. The system around it is.

[5] Why the Old Excuses Don’t Hold Up Anymore

We’ve heard the same arguments for fifty years: too risky, too slow, too dirty. They don’t hold up anymore.

Modern Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) flip the playbook. Instead of billion-dollar one-offs, they’re built in factories, shipped by truck, and dropped into place. That means faster builds, lower costs, and easier scaling.

Waste? Not the boogeyman people think. The entire volume of spent fuel from 60 years of U.S. nuclear power could fit on a single football field, stacked just 30 feet high. And it’s all accounted for—stored, shielded, and monitored.

The safety numbers aren’t even close. Nuclear ranks among the safest energy sources on Earth, with just 0.07 deaths per terawatt-hour. Coal kills 24.6. Oil kills 18.4. Even hydro beats nuclear in body count.

Yes, the old plants were expensive and overengineered. The new ones don’t have to be. We know how to make them safer, smaller, cheaper. We’ve just been told not to try.

The excuses are leftovers from a different era. If we’re still using them, it’s not because they’re true. It’s because they’re easy.

[6] The Politics Are Finally Shifting

For the first time in decades, both parties are backing nuclear.

In 2024, the White House issued an executive order calling nuclear power a vital piece of the clean energy supply chain. Then in 2025, President Trump signed his own executive order accelerating siting and permitting of next-gen reactors, emphasizing grid resilience and energy independence.

Congress got the memo. The ADVANCE Act passed with bipartisan support to speed up licensing, cut red tape at the NRC, and modernize regulations.

States are flipping too. Wyoming, Illinois, and Kentucky have all moved to clear the way for SMRs. Not exactly green havens. Just places that still want to build.

Even a few old-school environmental groups are quietly backing nuclear. Turns out “carbon-free” doesn’t mean much if the lights won’t stay on.

[7] Micro and Modular: The Future of Nuclear is Flexible (200 words)

The nuclear future isn’t skyscrapers; it’s Lego blocks. SMRs and microreactors are breaking down energy into movable, manageable pieces.

Take TerraPower’s Natrium: a 345 MWe sodium‐cooled reactor, paired with molten‐salt heat storage that lets it surge to 500 MWe during peak demand. It’s not a megaproject—it’s modular, flexible, and coming online in Wyoming by 2030.
X‑energy’s Xe‑100 uses TRISO pebble‑fuel for passive safety. At 80 MWe per unit, you stack four or more and hit 300 MWe on site in Washington State by around 2028.
NuScale’s VOYGR: factory‑built 77 MWe modules, shipped by rail, with a six‑pack variant (462 MWe) ready for Idaho. NRC approved it already—first modular reactor certificate in the U.S.
On the micro‑side, Oklo’s Aurora (1.5 MWe) and Westinghouse’s eVinci (5 MWe) fit in shipping containers. The DoD’s Project Pele is deploying a mobile gas‑cooled microreactor to power military bases or disaster zones.

Valar atomics is building microreactors at a breakneck pace:

Sunday SpotlightSpotlight: Valar AtomicsLuke Ringlein·Aug 3Read full story

What’s core is scalability and localization: build only what you need, where you need it. No more one‑size‑fits‐all nukes or decade‑long permitting cycles. These reactors come online fast, cost less, adapt to local loads, and reduce strain on transmission. That’s power built for the AI era, and resilience built for the next attack, blackout, or energy shock.

[8] Why Decentralization Is National Security

The grid we’ve got is easy to hit. In 2022, armed attackers shot up two substations in North Carolina, cutting power to 45,000 people. A few bullets. Days in the dark. That’s all it took.

Now scale that up. Imagine a coordinated cyberattack. Or a storm that knocks out a transmission hub feeding a military base or AI training cluster. Our centralized grid is a single point of failure. That’s a problem.

Decentralized nuclear flips the equation. Small modular reactors and microreactors can be placed directly where power is needed—data centers, chip fabs, missile silos. No long wires. No wait.

Texas just launched a $2 billion state fund to attract advanced nuclear alongside AI and industrial projects. Jigar Shah, head of the DOE loan office, called it plainly: "You need that diversified supply chain... that requires intentionality."

If one unit goes down, the rest stay live. If a region takes a hit, local grids keep running. That’s not just engineering. That’s deterrence.

A grid hardened by distributed nuclear isn’t just more stable. It’s harder to kill.

[9] What’s Still in the Way—and What Needs to Change

The tech is ready. The politics are catching up. The bottlenecks are now structural.

Start with the regulator. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was built for 1970s gigawatt-scale plants, not modular reactors that fit in a truck. Getting approval can still take nearly a decade. The ADVANCE Act helps, but the NRC needs a full rewrite—not just a nudge.

Money matters too. Advanced nuclear isn’t cheap upfront. But the DOE Loan Programs Office can bridge the gap, especially for first-of-a-kind deployments. If we want SMRs in data centers, on military bases, and at grid choke points, we’ll have to frontload the investment.

Fuel is a choke point. Most advanced reactors run on HALEU, a higher-enriched uranium the U.S. doesn’t currently produce at scale. Right now, we rely on imports—including from Russia. That has to end.

Last, the public. People still think Chernobyl, not France. But when communities learn what these reactors actually look like—small, quiet, zero emissions—they shift. Local jobs help too.

The roadblocks aren’t technical anymore. They’re institutional. And institutions can be rebuilt.

[10] A Playbook for the Builders

Declare nuclear a strategic mission. Not just clean energy; national power. That means prioritizing it like we do semiconductors or missiles.

Use the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program to fast-track construction. Put steel in the ground. Prove it works, then scale it.

Create innovation sandboxes with relaxed rules for testing advanced reactors. Cut the red tape before it chokes the tech.

Rebuild the manufacturing base. Most components are imported or custom-fabricated. We need suppliers here. And we need welders, not just white papers.

Finally, go local. Don’t drop a reactor in someone’s town and call it patriotism. Show the benefits: jobs, stability, energy independence. Let communities co-own the build.

This isn’t a Manhattan Project. It’s a Main Street project. That’s how we win support and keep it.

Conclusion

This country used to build things fast. Big things. Things that lasted.

Nuclear is one of them. It’s dense, clean, and ready. It gives us uptime when the grid fails and leverage when our rivals push.

SMRs and microreactors aren’t science fiction. They’re tools. We’ve already got them. What we need is the will to move.

The tech is real. The risk of standing still is greater than the risk of moving forward.

No one’s coming to do it for us. The reactor is waiting.

If you found this article useful, enjoyable, or interesting, consider subscribing. All of my work is free.

I publish 3x a week; one explanatory piece like this one, a review of weekly news with a focus on actionable insight, and a profile of an interesting company tackling America’s toughest problems.

Your support means the world.